Tuesday, May 10, 2011

LEGAL EAGLES - PART DEUX


Someone wrote recently in response to the last post - asking a legal question (of course). I advised them to consult a lawyer and... THEY DID! They actually consulted a lawyer about a legal issue.

I dunno about you, but I have newfound faith in humanity. Thank you, Pitch Bible Pen Pal!

Here's what they asked...

He essentially wanted to make a parody of an existing film property. I said, "Check with a lawyer". Here's what the lawyer wrote:

The short answer is that it is possible to make a film in the manner you are proposing. You just need to be careful that you do not reproduce too much of the original script, music, artworks or film. It can be a fine line between reproducing enough to evoke the original, without actually copying a substantial part of it.

A few years ago the line was shifted a little further in your favour by the enactment of a 'parody & satire' fair dealing exception in the copyright act - but this has not really been tested by a case yet so there is doubt as to how it would be interpreted.

You might also have other rights you'd need to be careful of - using a sufficiently different name to ensure you're not infringing any trade marks for example.

Where there is a significant investment in the film, the producer might decide to licence rights anyway, just to make sure there is no problem.

What's that? Run that last part by me again...?

Where there is a significant investment in the film, the producer might decide to licence rights anyway, just to make sure there is no problem.

A little louder, so the kids in the back row can hear...?

Where there is a significant investment in the film, the producer might decide to licence rights anyway, just to make sure there is no problem.

Yeah. That's what I thought. If you don't own it - clear the rights.

And there you have it. Straight from The Legal Eagle's mouth!!! CLEAR THE RIGHTS!

3 comments:

  1. Thanks for this post Steve - You cover it all plus more. As you've ended, and said many times before, if you don't own it - don't use it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What is applicable to films is also applicable to text content on the web. Looking at someone's content and rewording in your own words is not considered plagiarism.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There is a difference between "re-wording" something (changing the words) and adding new insights and ideas to a subject.

    A lazy writer does the former, a GOOD writer does the latter.

    ReplyDelete